4.7 Article

Experimental Study of Failure Differences in Hard Rock Under True Triaxial Compression

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 52, Issue 7, Pages 2109-2122

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-018-1700-1

Keywords

True triaxial; Strength; Deformation anisotropy; Failure mechanism; Hard rock

Funding

  1. 111 Project [B17009]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11572083]
  3. State Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0600707]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In view of a previous study of the intermediate principal stress effect at a limited sigma(2) range, a series of true triaxial tests, covering a full range of intermediate principal stresses that vary from the generalized triaxial compression stress state (sigma(2)=sigma(3)) to the generalized triaxial tensile stress state (sigma(1)=sigma(2)), was carried out on sandstone and granite samples. The experimental results revealed that the deformation, failure strength and failure mode have a significant dependence on the stress state. As an effect of the intermediate principal stress on crack evolution, the deformation difference known as stress-induced deformation anisotropy occurred and should be considered when developing the mechanical model. Moreover, a post-peak deformation with a step-shaped stress drop is observed and illustrates that there will be a multi-stage bearing capacity after the rock failure. The peak strength is non-symmetrical with the increasing sigma(2) and is closely related to the Lode angle. Based on the final fracture surface and SEM analysis under true triaxial compression, three failure modes and failure zones, including tension failure, shear failure and mixed failure, are delineated and discussed. Combining the failure mode and the strength under true triaxial compression, it is found that the strength variation exhibited a close relationship to the failure mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available