4.5 Article

An investigation on the relationship between FTIR indices and surface free energy of RAP binders

Journal

ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 1326-1340

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2018.1552889

Keywords

RAP; surface free energy; FTIR; ageing indices; healing indices

Funding

  1. FTIR lab of the central research facility of Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of RAP bituminous mixes depends on the properties of the binder in the RAP material. Surface free energy of a binder, which is a fundamental property of materials, can be used to explain moisture damage, rutting, fracture and healing potential of bituminous mixes. Similarly, different chemical properties of binders can be used to estimate their mechanical properties. The relationship between the surface free energy of the binders and their chemical composition (in terms of functional groups) has been investigated in this study. For this purpose, blends of a virgin binder (VG30 grade) and the RAP binder extracted from a RAP material were prepared. Surface free energy of the binder blends was measured using sessile drop technique. The chemical composition of the blends was obtained using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis. Different ageing and healing indices were calculated from FIR analysis. Different ageing indices are found to have good correlation with surface free energy and its components. No significant relationship could be observed between healing indices and surface free energy of the binder blends. The correlations presented in the study between different indices estimated from FTIR analysis and the surface free energy components obtained by sessile drop method will be useful in furthering the understanding of the characteristics of binders, especially RAP binders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available