4.5 Article

Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol level as a screening tool for diabetes mellitus in a community-based population at high risk of diabetes

Journal

ACTA DIABETOLOGICA
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 425-431

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-016-0944-z

Keywords

1,5-Anhydroglucitol; Screening; Diagnosis; Diabetes mellitus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Early diagnosis of diabetes yields significant clinical benefits; however, currently available diagnostic tools for community-based population are limited. This study aimed to assess the value of serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) for the diagnosis and screening of diabetes mellitus in a community-based population at high risk of diabetes. Methods In this diagnostic test, 1170 participants underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Venous blood samples were collected for fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (PBG), and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurements. Serum 1,5-AG levels were detected by the GlycoMark assay, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to assess their diagnostic value for diabetes. Results A total of 298 adults were diagnosed with diabetes, indicating a prevalence of 25.47%. Partial Pearson correlation analysis adjusted for age and body mass index showed that serum 1,5-AG level was negatively correlated with FBG, PBG, and HbA1c (all P < 0.01). Areas under the curves (AUCs) for serum 1,5-AG, FBG, PBG, and HbA1c in identifying diabetes were 0.920, 0.874, 0.933, and 0.887, respectively. According to the ROC curve, the optimal cutoff value of serum 1,5-AG for diagnosing diabetes was 11.18 mu g/ml, which yielded a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 82.3%, respectively. Comparisons between 1,5-AG and HbA1c showed that both the AUC and sensitivity of 1,5-AG were higher than those of HbA1c (both P < 0.01). Conclusions Serum 1,5-AG is a simple and effective marker with high sensitivity and specificity for identifying diabetes in populations at high risk of diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available