4.8 Article

Volatile loss following cooling and accretion of the Moon revealed by chromium isotopes

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809060115

Keywords

Moon; chromium; evaporation; low temperature; equilibrium

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under H2020 framework program/ERC Grant [637503]
  2. UnivEarthS Labex program at Sorbonne Paris Cite [ANR-10-LABX-0023, ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche through chaire d'excellence Sorbonne Paris Cite
  4. Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris multidisciplinary program PARI
  5. Paris-Ile-de-France region Soutien aux Equipes Scientifiques pour l'Acquisition de Moyens Experimentaux Grant [12015908]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Terrestrial and lunar rocks share chemical and isotopic similarities in refractory elements, suggestive of a common precursor. By contrast, the marked depletion of volatile elements in lunar rocks together with their enrichment in heavy isotopes compared with Earth's mantle suggests that the Moon underwent evaporative loss of volatiles. However, whether equilibrium prevailed during evaporation and, if so, at what conditions (temperature, pressure, and oxygen fugacity) remain unconstrained. Chromium may shed light on this question, as it has several thermodynamically stable, oxidized gas species that can distinguish between kinetic and equilibrium regimes. Here, we present high-precision Cr isotope measurements in terrestrial and lunar rocks that reveal an enrichment in the lighter isotopes of Cr in the Moon compared with Earth's mantle by 100 +/- 40 ppm per atomic mass unit. This observation is consistent with Cr partitioning into an oxygen-rich vapor phase in equilibrium with the proto-Moon, thereby stabilizing the CrO2 species that is isotopically heavy compared with CrO in a lunar melt. Temperatures of 1,600-1,800 K and oxygen fugacities near the fayalite-magnetite-quartz buffer are required to explain the elemental and isotopic difference of Cr between Earth's mantle and the Moon. These temperatures are far lower than modeled in the aftermath of a giant impact, implying that volatile loss did not occur contemporaneously with impact but following cooling and accretion of the Moon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available