4.5 Article

Improvement in the blood compatibility of polyvinylidene fluoride membranes via in situ cross-linking polymerization

Journal

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 923-931

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pat.4525

Keywords

blood compatibility; contact activation; in situ cross-linking polymerization; polyvinylidene fluoride

Funding

  1. Major Construction Project of First-rate University in Guizhou Province [2017158134]
  2. Foundation of the Education Department of Guizhou Province [KY[2015]467, KY[2017]085]
  3. Guiyang Science and Technology Bureau [GYU-KYZ[2018]03-02]
  4. Guiyang University [GYU-KYZ[2018]03-02]
  5. Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province [LH[2015]7305 J[2015]2008]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51603048]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we have provided a highly efficient, convenient, and universal protocol for preparing polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes with low blood contact activation via in situ cross-linking copolymerization of 2-hydroxyethl methacrylate (HEMA) and acrylic acid (AA) in a solution of PVDF. The modified membranes were prepared from PVDF solution by phase inversion technology. The composition and morphology of the modified membranes were confirmed by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Protein adsorption, clotting time, and contact activation on the modified PVDF membranes were systematically studied, the results indicating that after the incorporation of AA and HEMA, the modified PVDF membranes possessed anticoagulant properties in addition to low contact activation of blood components when in contact with blood. Therefore, fluorinated PVDF membranes with surfaces enriched with carboxyl and hydroxyl groups possessed the potential for use in long-term blood-contacting devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available