4.6 Article

The point-of-care Bilistick method has very short turn-around-time and high accuracy at lower cutoff levels to predict laboratory-measured TSB

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 216-220

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-019-0304-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman of Malaysia [IPSR/RMC/UTARRF/2016-C2/B01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of a point-of-care Bilistick method for measuring total serum bilirubin (TSB) and its turn-around-time (TAT) against hospital laboratory methods. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out on 561 term-gestation jaundiced neonates in two Malaysian hospitals. Venous blood sample was collected from each neonate for contemporary measurement of TSB by hospital laboratories and Bilistick. TAT was the time interval between specimen collection and TSB result reported by each method. Results: The mean laboratory-measured TSB was 194.85 (+/- 2.844) mu mol/L and Bilistick TSB was 169.37 (+/- 2.706) mu mol/L. Pearson's correlation coefficient was: r = 0.901 (p < 0.001). The mean difference of [laboratory TSB- Bilistick TBS] was 26.48 (+/- 29.41) mu mol/L. The Bland-Altman plots show that the 95% limits of agreement (-31.1577, 84.11772) contain 94.7% (=531/561) of the difference in TSB readings. Bilistick has a 99% accuracy and 100% sensitivity to predict laboratory TSB levels of >= 80 mu mol/L and >= 360 mu mol/L at lower Bilistick TSB levels of >= 55 and >= 315 mu mol/L, respectively. TAT of Bilistick TSB (2.0 min) was significantly shorter than TAT (105 min) of laboratory TSB (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bilistick has shorter TAT. The accuracy and sensitivity of Bilistick TSB for predicting laboratory TSB is high at lower cutoff levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available