4.5 Review

Parent experiences and information needs related to bronchiolitis: A mixed studies systematic review

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages 864-878

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.013

Keywords

Systematic review; Child; Bronchiolitis; Parent; Experience

Funding

  1. Network of Centres of Excellence in Knowledge Mobilization
  2. TREKK (TRanslating Emergency Knowledge for Kids)
  3. Women and Children's Health Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To inform evidence-based knowledge products (i.e., infographics, videos, eBooks) of relevance to parents, we systematically reviewed evidence on parent experiences and information needs related to bronchiolitis. Methods: We searched Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and scanned reference lists for studies published post-2000. We appraised quality in duplicate using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and synthesized findings narratively. Results: We retrieved 797 records and included 29; 14 (48%) met > 50% of MMAT criteria. Studies predominantly enrolled mothers. Most reported quantitatively on hospitalization experiences (n = 9, 31%), treatments (n = 5, 17%), or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prophylaxis (n = 9, 31%). Ten (34%) studies reported on information needs; 3 contributed qualitative data. Parents could not always identify bronchiolitis symptoms. During hospitalization, parents endured guilt and anxiety. Mothers wanted to take an active role in their child's care but often felt uninvolved. Barriers to RSV prophylaxis included transportation, scheduling, and insurance issues. Conclusions: Evidence focused primarily on hospitalization, which parents found frightening. More information is needed on home care experiences and information preferences. Practice implications: Timely education and support from healthcare providers may help to alleviate parents' fears and enhance involvement in their child's care. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available