4.3 Article

Diagnostic and Prognostic Impact of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas With High-Grade Dysplasia and Associated Invasive Carcinoma

Journal

PANCREAS
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 99-106

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001202

Keywords

C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio; diagnosis; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; tumor marker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic impact of systemic inflammatory markers for IPMN with high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/invasive carcinoma. Methods: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derivedNLR, platelet-tolymphocyte ratio, and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio were compared across the different histological grades of 205 IPMN cases. We also tested the diagnostic performance for IPMN with HGD/invasive carcinoma. Results: The median (interquartile range) preoperative NLR was higher in IPMN with HGD/invasive carcinoma (2.03 [1.48-2.93]) than IPMN with low-grade dysplasia (1.74 [1.42-2.24], P = 0.0137). The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and derived NLR values were also significant higher in cases with HGD/invasive carcinoma. A combination assay of NLR, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 revealed a 58.8% sensitivity and 76.8% specificity. Among the cases with worrisome features, the high NLR values increased the positive predictive value (68.8%) compared with low values (31.8%). In IPMN caseswith the associated invasive carcinoma, high NLR values showed association with the deeper vertical invasion and shorter survival periods. Conclusions: Preoperative NLR, combined with tumormarkers and image findings, can be a useful predictive marker for the presence of HGD/invasive carcinoma in IPMNs. PreoperativeNLR also predicts the long-termoutcomes in IPMN cases with invasive carcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available