4.3 Article

Neutron dark matter decays and correlation coefficients of neutron β--decays

Journal

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
Volume 938, Issue -, Pages 114-130

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.11.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Austrian Fonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FWF) [P31702-N27, P26781-N20, P26636-N20]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB/TR 55]
  3. Deutsche Forderungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [AB 128/5-2]
  4. MA 23 under the project Photonik - Stiftungsprofessur fur Lehre
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P26781, P26636] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As we have pointed out in (arXiv:1806.10107 [hep-ph]), the existence of neutron dark matter decay modes n -> chi + anything, where chi is a dark matter fermion, for the solution of the neutron lifetime problem changes priorities and demands to describe the neutron lifetime tau(n) = 888.0(2.0) s, measured in beam experiments and defined by the decay modes n -> p + anything, in the Standard Model (SM). The latter requires the axial coupling constant lambda to be equal to lambda = -1.2690 (arXiv:1806.10107 [hep-ph]). Since such an axial coupling constant is excluded by experimental data reported by the PERKEO II and UCNA Collaborations, the neutron lifetime tau(n) = 888.0(2.0) s can be explained only by virtue of interactions beyond the SM, namely, by the Fierz interference term of order b similar to-10(-2) dependent on scalar and tensor coupling constants. We give a complete analysis of all correlation coefficients of the neutron beta(-)-decays with polarized neutron, taking into account the contributions of scalar and tensor interactions beyond the SM with the Fierz interference term b similar to-10(-2). We show that the obtained results agree well with contemporary experimental data that does not prevent the neutron with the rate of the decay modes n -> p + anything, measured in beam experiments, to have dark matter decay modes n -> chi + anything. (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available