4.8 Article

D1 dopamine receptors intrinsic activity and functional selectivity affect working memory in prefrontal cortex

Journal

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 645-655

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-018-0312-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [U19 MH082441, R01 MH040537] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS105471] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared two different D-1 agonists and found that 2-methyldihydrexidine was more effective in enhancing cognition compared to CY208,243, based on its impact on neural activity and cognitive performance.
Dopamine D-1 agonists enhance cognition, but the role of different signaling pathways (e.g., cAMP or beta-arrestin) is unclear. The current study compared 2-methyldihydrexidine and CY208,243, drugs with different degrees of both D-1 intrinsic activity and functional selectivity. 2-Methyldihydrexidine is a full agonist at adenylate cyclase and a super-agonist at beta-arrestin recruitment, whereas CY208,243 has relatively high intrinsic activity at adenylate cyclase, but much lower at beta-arrestin recruitment. Both drugs decreased, albeit in dissimilar ways, the firing rate of neurons in prefrontal cortex sensitive to outcome-related aspects of a working memory task. 2-Methyldihydrexidine was superior to CY208,243 in prospectively enhancing similarity and retrospectively distinguishing differences between correct and error outcomes based on firing rates, enhancing the micro-network measured by oscillations of spikes and local field potentials, and improving behavioral performance. This study is the first to examine how ligand signaling bias affects both behavioral and neurophysiological endpoints in the intact animal. The data show that maximal enhancement of cognition via D-1 activation occurred with a pattern of signaling that involved full unbiased intrinsic activity, or agonists with high beta-arrestin activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available