4.7 Article

Molecular Imprinting of Cyclodextrin Supramolecular Hydrogels Improves Drug Loading and Delivery

Journal

MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800246

Keywords

affinity; cyclodextrin; drug delivery; infection; molecular imprinting

Funding

  1. Undergraduate Research and Creative Endeavors (SoURCE) at Case Western Reserve University
  2. NIH [C06 RR12463-01]
  3. [T32DK083251-09]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [T32DK083251] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyclodextrin-based controlled delivery materials have previously been developed for controlled release of different therapeutic drugs. In this study, a supramolecular hydrogel made from cyclodextrin-based macromonomers is subjected to molecular imprinting to investigate the impact on release kinetics and drug loading, when compared with non-imprinted, or alternately imprinted hydrogels. Mild synthesis conditions are used to molecularly imprint three antibioticsnovobiocin, rifampicin, and vancomycinand to test two different hydrogel chemistries. The release profile and drug loading of the molecularly imprinted hydrogels are characterized using ultraviolet spectroscopy over a period of 35 days and compared to non-imprinted, and alternately imprinted hydrogels. While only modest differences are observed in the release rate of the antibiotics tested, a substantial difference is observed in the total drug-loading amount possible for hydrogels releasing drugs which has been templated by those drugs. Hydrogels releasing drugs which are templated by other drugs do not show improved release or loading. Analysis by FTIR does not show substantial incorporation of drug into the polymer. Lastly, bioactivity assays confirmed long-term stability and release of incorporated antibiotics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available