4.7 Article

Anti-hyperlipidemic and hepatoprotective properties of wheat bran with different particle sizes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages 1990-1996

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9397

Keywords

wheat bran; particle size; rats; high-fat diet; serum and liver biomarkers

Funding

  1. Anhui Natural Sciences Foundation [11008761]
  2. Anhui Sciences and Technology Plant Project [1704a07020098, Ilj20170144]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Wheat bran has been shown to have health-promoting benefits in relation to diabetes, colorectal cancer, cardiovascular disease, constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, diverticulitis, and gastrointestinal disease. However, its effects on obesity, hyperglycemia, hepatotoxicity, and hyperlipidemia are not yet clear. The effects of the consumption of wheat bran of different particle sizes (coarse, 427.55 mu m versus ultra-fine, 11.63 mu m) on body weight, serum glucose, liver, and blood lipid metabolism levels in high-fat-diet induced rats fed for 5 weeks were investigated. RESULTS The high-fat diet significantly increased body weight, serum glucose, serum and liver lipids, and malondialdehyde levels. However, addition of coarse and ultra-fine wheat bran to a high-fat diet decreased weight gain, reduced the levels of serum and liver total cholesterol, triglycerides, malondialdehyde, serum low-density lipoprotein, and serum glucose, and improved serum high-density lipoprotein. Moreover, when two particle sizes were compared, the highest impact was exhibited by the wheat bran containing the larger particle size. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that micronized wheat bran significantly improves anti-hyperlipidemic and hepatoprotective properties that might provide a safeguard to protect humans against metabolic syndrome abnormalities and other acute, recurrent, or chronic diseases. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available