4.5 Article

Diamond nanoparticles coating for in-tube solid-phase microextraction to detect polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 41, Issue 24, Pages 4480-4487

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201800862

Keywords

diamond nanoparticles; high-performance liquid chromatography; online analysis; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; solid-phase microextraction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21777054]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [ZR2017MB043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diamond nanoparticles were coated onto stainless steel wires as a extraction material, then it was filled into a poly(ether ether ketone) tube for in-tube solid-phase microextraction. Coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography, the extraction tube was evaluated with different types of analytes including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, estrogens and plasticizers. As the coating, diamond nanoparticles exhibited greater extraction capacity for hydrophobic analytes. Several polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were used as model analytes, four main extraction and desorption factors were optimized, including sampling volume, sampling rate, methanol content in sample and desorption time. A sensitive analysis method was established with wide linear range (0.016-20 mu g/L), good correlation coefficients (0.9991-0.9997), low limits of detection (0.005-0.020 mu g/L), low limits of quantitation (0.016-0.070 mu g/L) and high enrichment factors (305-2396). Relative standard deviations for intra-and interday were less than 2.4% (n = 3) and 8.4% (n = 3), respectively. Durability and chemical stability were satisfactory with relative standard deviations less than 7.9% (n = 3). Finally, the method has been successfully applied to the detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in real samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available