4.5 Article

A randomized clinical trial of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives in donor site of connective tissue grafts

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages 608-615

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/JPER.18-0475

Keywords

cyanoacrylates; pain; sutures; tissue adhesives; wound healing

Funding

  1. Dr. Gerald Niznick College of Dentistry Endowment Fund, University of Manitoba
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The purpose was to compare patient-centered outcomes, early wound healing, and postoperative complications at palatal donor area of subepithelial connective tissue grafts (CTG) between cyanoacrylates tissue adhesives and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sutures. Methods Thirty-six patients who required harvesting of CTG were enrolled in this randomized clinical trial and assigned to one of two groups. In the suture group, wound closure was achieved with standardized continuous interlocking 6-0 PTFE sutures, while in the cyanoacrylate group, a high viscosity blend of n-butyl and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate was applied until hemostasis was achieved. The primary outcome was the discomfort (eating, speaking, etc.) from the donor site during the first postoperative week; this was self-reported on a visual analog scale questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were the time required for suture placement or cyanoacrylate application, patient self-reported pain on the first day and the first week after surgery, the analgesic intake and the modified early-wound healing index (MEHI). Results The median value of discomfort was 1.49 in the suture group and 1.86 in the cyanoacrylate (P = 0.56). The mean time required for suture placement was 7.31 minutes and for cyanoacrylate application 2.16 minutes (P < 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were found between the two methods in reported pain level, analgesic intake, and MEHI. Conclusions Cyanoacrylate performs similarly to sutures and can be used for wound closure of the donor site of CTG. The application was about 5 minutes faster than conventional suture placement, reducing the total time of the surgical procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available