4.7 Article

Mutations in Recessive Congenital Ichthyoses Illuminate the Origin and Functions of the Corneocyte Lipid Envelope

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages 760-768

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.11.005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 AR061106]
  2. NIH [P40 OD010939, R01 AR068392, R01 AR51968]
  3. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
  4. Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (HDFCCC) Laboratory for Cell Analysis Shared Resource Facility through NIH [P30 CA082103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The corneocyte lipid envelope (CLE), a monolayer of u-hydroxyceramides whose function(s) remain(s) uncertain, is absent in patients with autosomal recessive congenital ichthyoses with mutations in enzymes that regulate epidermal lipid synthesis. Secreted lipids fail to transform into lamellar membranes in certain autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis epidermis, suggesting the CLE provides a scaffold for the extracellular lamellae. However, because cornified envelopes are attenuated in these autosomal recessive congenital ichthyoses, the CLE may also provide a scaffold for subjacent cornified envelope formation, evidenced by restoration of cornified envelopes after CLE rescue. We provide multiple lines of evidence that the CLE originates as lamellar body-limiting membranes fuse with the plasma membrane: (i) ABCA12 patients and Abca12 e/e mice display normal CLEs; (ii) CLEs are normal in Netherton syndrome, despite destruction of secreted LB contents; (iii) CLEs are absent in VSP33B-negative patients; (iv) limiting membranes of lamellar bodies are defective in lipid-synthetic autosomal recessive congenital ichthyoses; and (v) lipoxygenases, lipase activity, and LIPN co-localize within putative lamellar bodies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available