4.7 Article

Comparative Efficacy of Artemether-Lumefantrine and Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in Ugandan Children

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 219, Issue 7, Pages 1112-1120

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy637

Keywords

Treatment efficacy; malaria; artemether-lumefantrine; dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine; Uganda

Funding

  1. World Bank, via the AFCC2/RI-East African Public Health Laboratory Networking Project [P111556]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. In Uganda, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQ) showed excellent treatment efficacy for uncomplicated malaria in prior trials. Because the frequency of resistance to artemisinins and piperaquine is increasing in Southeast Asia and the prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum polymorphisms associated with resistance has changed, we reassessed treatment efficacies at 3 sites in Uganda. Methods. For this randomized, single-blinded clinical trial, children aged 6-59 months with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were assigned treatment with AL or DHA-PQ and followed for 42 days. Primary end points were risks of recurrent parasitemia, either unadjusted or adjusted to distinguish recrudescence from new infection. We assessed selection by study regimens of relevant P. falciparum genetic polymorphisms associated with drug resistance. Results. Of 599 patients enrolled, 578 completed follow-up. There were no early treatment failures. The risk of recurrent parasitemia was lower with DHA-PQ as compared to AL at all 3 sites at 42 days (26.0% vs 47.0%; P < .001). Recrudescent infections were uncommon in both the DHA-PQ and AL arms (1.1% and 2.2%, respectively; P = .25). Neither regimen selected for pfcrt or pfmdr1 polymorphisms associated with drug resistance. Conclusions. AL and DHA-PQ remain effective for the treatment of malaria in Uganda. Neither regimen selected for genetic polymorphisms associated with drug resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available