4.7 Article

Improving the use of ground-based radar rainfall data for monitoring and predicting floods in the Iguacu river basin

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 567, Issue -, Pages 626-636

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.046

Keywords

Radar rainfall; Streamflow ensemble; Uncertainties precipitation; Flood event

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil
  2. Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES), Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the efficiency of correcting radar rainfall estimates using a stochastic error model in the upper Iguacu river basin in Southern Brazil for improving streamflow simulations. The 2-Dimensional Satellite Rainfall Error Model (SREM2D) is adopted here and modified to account for topographic complexity, seasonality, and distance from the radar. SREM2D was used to correct the radar rainfall estimates and produce an ensemble of equally probable rainfall fields, that were then used to force a distributed hydrological model. Systematic and random errors in simulated streamflow were evaluated for a cascade of sub-basins of the Iguacu catchment, with drainage area ranging from 1,808 to 21,536 km(2)). Results showed an improvement in the statistical metrics when the SREM2D ensemble was used as input to the hydrological model in place of the radar rainfall estimates in most sub-basins. Specifically, SREM2D was able to remove the relative bias (up to 50%) in the radar rainfall dataset regardless of the basin dimension, whereas the random error was reduced more prominently in the larger basins (up to 100 m(3) s(-1)). An event scale evaluation was also performed for nine selected flood events in three sub-basins. SREM2D reduced the overestimation in the cumulative rainfall and streamflow volumes during these events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available