4.3 Article

Positive clinical signs in neurological diseases - An observational study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 141-145

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.113

Keywords

Clinical signs; Positive signs; Organic neurological disease; Functional neurological disorder

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many patients with organic neurological disease have symptoms and signs that are unexplained by their disease condition. We attempted to explore the prevalence of positive clinical signs in patients with various organic neurological diseases. We performed a prospective uncontrolled observational study on the presence of 7 positive signs in adults with various organic neurological diseases that were admitted to our tertiary care hospital. This observation was performed during their neurological examination in those who provided consent, could comprehend and lacked terminal illness or profound weakness that limited their ability to perform these tasks. We dichotomized them into two groups based on the presence of these signs. Out of 190 patients that were evaluated between 2014 and 2015, 37 patients had at least one positive sign. On univariate analysis: young age, female gender, prior anxiety, history of childhood abuse, identification of sensory deficits on examination and lack of imaging correlation with clinical localization were identified as risk factors for these positive signs. On multivariate analysis, anxiety (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.11-7.49, p = 0.03) and presence of sensory deficits on examination (OR 5.81, 95% CI 2.36-14.32, p <= 0.001) were associated with these positive signs. Positive signs are common in patients with organic neurological diseases that have anxiety or sensory deficits and may imply a component of functional overlay. Large studies are required to understand its pathophysiology and impact on future outcomes. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available