4.8 Article

Loss of placental growth factor ameliorates maternal hypertension and preeclampsia in mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 128, Issue 11, Pages 5008-5017

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI99026

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MD Anderson Cancer Center
  2. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas
  3. University of Texas STARs Program
  4. Preeclampsia Foundation Vision Grant
  5. Baylor College of Medicine Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preeclampsia remains a clinical challenge due to its poorly understood pathogenesis. A prevailing notion is that increased placental production of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) causes the maternal syndrome by inhibiting proangiogenic placental growth factor (PlGF) and VEGF. However, the significance of PlGF suppression in preeclampsia is uncertain. To test whether preeclampsia results from the imbalance of angiogenic factors reflected by an abnormal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, we studied PlGF KO (Pgf(-/-)) mice and noted that the mice did not develop signs or sequelae of preeclampsia despite a marked elevation in circulating sFLT-1. Notably, PlGF KO mice had morphologically distinct placentas, showing an accumulation of junctional zone glycogen. We next considered the role of placental PlGF in an established model of preeclampsia (pregnant catechol-O-methyltransferase-deficient [COMT-deficient] mice) by generating mice with deletions in both the Pgf and Comt genes. Deletion of placental PlGF in the context of COMT loss resulted in a reduction in maternal blood pressure and increased placental glycogen, indicating that loss of PlGF might be protective against the development of preeclampsia. These results identify a role for PlGF in placental development and support a complex model for the pathogenesis of preeclampsia beyond an angiogenic factor imbalance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available