4.6 Article

Decellularized Wharton's jelly extracellular matrix as a promising scaffold for promoting hepatic differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 120, Issue 4, Pages 6683-6697

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.27965

Keywords

decellularized scaffold; hepatic differentiation; human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs); liver tissue engineering; Wharton's jelly (WJ)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liver tissue engineering as a therapeutic option for restoring of damaged liver function has a special focus on using native decellularized liver matrix, but there are limitations such as the shortage of liver donor. Therefore, an appropriate alternative scaffold is needed to circumvent the donor shortage. This study was designed to evaluate hepatic differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) in decellularized Wharton's jelly (WJ) matrix as an alternative for native liver matrix. WJ matrices were treated with a series of detergents for decellularization. Then hiPSCs were seeded into decellularized WJ scaffold (DWJS) for hepatic differentiation by a defined induction protocol. The DNA quantitative assay and histological evaluation showed that cellular and nuclear materials were efficiently removed and the composition of extracellular matrix was maintained. In DWJS, hiPSCs-derived hepatocyte-like cells (hiPSCs-Heps) efficiently entered into the differentiation phase (G1) and gradually took a polygonal shape, a typical shape of hepatocytes. The expression of hepatic-associated genes (albumin, TAT, Cytokeratin19, and Cyp7A1), albumin and urea secretion in hiPSCs-Heps cultured into DWJS was significantly higher than those cultured in the culture plates (2D). Altogether, our results suggest that DWJS could provide a proper microenvironment that efficiently promotes hepatic differentiation of hiPSCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available