Journal
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue 2, Pages 383-392Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-018-2799-x
Keywords
Elastin; MMP; Neutrophil elastase; Cathepsin g; Proteinase 3; Biomarker; Lung cancer; NSCLC; ECM; Serum
Categories
Funding
- Danish Research Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
PurposeElastin is a signature protein of lungs. Increased elastin turnover driven by altered proteolytic activity is an important part of lung tumorigenesis. Elastin-derived fragments have been shown to be pro-tumorigenic, however, little is known regarding the biomarker potential of such elastin fragments. Here, we present an elastin turnover profile by non-invasively quantifying five specific elastin degradation fragments generated by different proteases.MethodsElastin fragments were assessed in serum from patients with stage I-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n=40) and healthy controls (n=30) using competitive ELISAs targeting different protease-generated fragments of elastin: ELM12 (generated by matrix metalloproteinase MMP-9 and -12), ELM7 (MMP-7), EL-NE (neutrophil elastase), EL-CG (cathepsin G) and ELP-3 (proteinase 3).ResultsELM12, ELM7, EL-NE and EL-CG were all significantly elevated in NSCLC patients (n=40) when compared to healthy controls (n=30) (ELM12, p=0.0191; ELM7, p<0.0001; EL-NE, p<0.0001; EL-CG, p<0.0001). ELP-3 showed no significant difference between patients and controls (p=0.8735). All fragments correlated positively (Spearman, r: 0.69-0.81) when compared pairwise, except ELM12 (Spearman, r: 0.042-0.097). In general, all fragments were detectable across all stages of the disease.ConclusionsElastin fragments generated by different proteases are elevated in lung cancer patients compared to healthy controls but differ in their presence. This demonstrates non-invasive biomarker potential of elastin fragments in serum from lung cancer patients and suggests that different pathological mechanisms may be responsible for the elastin turnover, warranting further validation in clinical trials.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available