4.7 Article

Correlation between performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell and degradation of the carbon support in the membrane electrode assembly using image processing method

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 43, Issue 45, Pages 20921-20930

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.016

Keywords

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell; Membrane electrode assembly; Carbon degradation; Image processing; Binarization processing

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education (MOE)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), through the Human Resource Training Project for Regional Innovation [2013H1B8A2032290]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-time operation and various conditions cause the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) to degrade, which results in decreased performance. The degradation of the MEA appears as various symptoms, such as the loss of carbon support and agglomeration of the Pt catalyst. In this paper, damage on the surface of the MEA by long-time operation and various conditions is induced intentionally by high-temperature conditions in a thermostat chamber. The MEA surface damage is photographed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the loss of the carbon support that fixes the platinum catalyst is judged. Image processing is used to analyze damage on the MEA surface, and binarization processing is applied to the image processing method. SEM imagery is taken at magnifications of 100 x and the trends in quantified surface damage on the MEA according to the degradation temperature are analyzed. The correlation between the quantitative damage on the MEA surface and the performance of the PEMFC is checked. As a result, the tendency of decreasing PEMFC performance is derived from increasing quantified damage on the MEA surface. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available