4.6 Review

Cyclic CO2 - H2O injection and residual trapping: Implications for CO2 injection efficiency and storage security

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.11.009

Keywords

CO2 storage; Residual trapping; CO2; Injection cycles; Supercritical CO2; Cyclic CO2 injection

Funding

  1. European Community's FP7 [227286]
  2. European Union [636811]
  3. European Union's H2020 Accelerating CCS technologies, EPSRC [EP/P026214/1]
  4. CO2CRC Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To meet the Paris Agreement target of limiting global warming to 2 degrees C or below it is widely accepted that Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) will have to be deployed at scale. For the first time, experiments have been undertaken over six cycles of water and supercritical CO2 injection using a state of the art high flow rig recreating in-situ conditions of near wellbore injection into analogue storage reservoir rocks. The results show that differential pressure continuously increases over multiple injection cycles. Our interpretation is that multiple cycles of injection result in a reduced effective permeability due to increased residual trapping acting as a barrier to flow resulting in reduced injectivity. This is supported by numerical modelling and field observations that show CO2 injectivity and its variation over time will be affected by multiple cycles of injection. These results suggest that loss of injectivity must be incorporated into the injection strategy and that careful management of cyclic injection will create the opportunity to increase residual trapping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available