4.5 Article

Risk of delayed bleeding after hemorrhoidectomy

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 247-253

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3176-6

Keywords

Hemorrhoidectomy; Ferguson procedure; LigaSure procedure; Delayed post-hemorrhoidectomy bleeding; Risk factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeDelayed post-hemorrhoidectomy bleeding (DPHB) is a rare but serious complication. We investigated the incidence and risk factors of DPHB in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy using the LigaSure device or the Ferguson procedure.MethodsThis retrospective study included 382 consecutive patients with symptomatic grades II to IV hemorrhoids who received either LigaSure (184 patients) or Ferguson (198 patients) hemorrhoidectomy procedures. Thirty-two patients who experienced DPHB after discharge were followed up.ResultsSignificantly fewer Ferguson group patients had DPHB compared to the LigaSure group (5.1% vs. 11.9%; P=0.015). In the overall population, the risk of DPHB was higher in (1) males compared to that of females (OR=3.39; 95% CI 1.50-7.69, P=0.003); (2) in the LigaSure group compared to the Ferguson group (OR=2.77; 95% CI 1.23-6.24, P=0.01); and (3) in patients with constipation (OR=6.59; 95% CI 2.73-15.89, P<0.0001). Males in the LigaSure group had a significantly higher rate of delayed bleeding than those in the Ferguson group (20% vs. 5.8%, P=0.004); no significant differences were found in females (4.9% vs. 4.5%, P=0.878). Subgroup analysis showed that in males, risk of DPHB increased significantly with postoperative constipation (OR=4.73, 95% CI 1.45-15.43, P=0.010) and the LigaSure procedure (OR=3.99, 95% CI 1.37-11.62, P=0.011). In females, the risk of DPHB was significantly associated with postoperative constipation (OR=8.80, 95% CI 2.24-34.54, P=0.002).ConclusionsThe LigaSure procedure and constipation are independent risk factors for DPHB in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy and can be used as predictors of outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available