4.7 Article

Characteristics and prognostic significance of profiling the peripheral blood T-cell receptor repertoire in patients with advanced lung cancer

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 145, Issue 5, Pages 1423-1431

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32145

Keywords

T-cell receptor repertoire; lung cancer; immunotherapy; prognosis; high-throughput sequencing

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372260, 81773056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lung cancer is one of the greatest threats to human health, and is initially detected and attacked by the immune system through tumor-reactive T cells. The aim of this study was to determine the basic characteristics and clinical significance of the peripheral blood T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire in patients with advanced lung cancer. To comprehensively profile the TCR repertoire, high-throughput sequencing was used to identify hypervariable rearrangements of complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) of the TCR beta chain in peripheral blood samples from 64 advanced lung cancer patients and 31 healthy controls. We found that the TCR repertoire differed substantially between lung cancer patients and healthy controls in terms of CDR3 clonotype, diversity, V/J segment usage, and sequence. Specifically, baseline diversity correlated with several clinical characteristics, and high diversity reflected a better immune status. Dynamic detection of the TCR repertoire during anticancer treatment was useful for prognosis. Both increased diversity and high overlap rate between the pre- and post-treatment TCR repertoires indicated clinical benefit. Combination of the diversity and overlap rate was used to categorize patients into immune improved or immune worsened groups and demonstrated enhanced prognostic significance. In conclusion, TCR repertoire analysis served as a useful indicator of disease development and prognosis in advanced lung cancer and may be utilized to direct future immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available