4.2 Article

Impact of setup orientation on blend electrospinning of poly-epsilon-caprolactone-gelatin scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
Volume 41, Issue 11, Pages 801-810

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0391398818803478

Keywords

Biocompatibility; fibre diameter; infiltration; polymer blends; pore size; vascular graft

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) for the Cluster of Excellence REBIRTH [EXC 62/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: This article explores the effect of horizontal and vertical setups on blend electrospinning with two polymers having vastly different properties - poly-epsilon-caprolactone and gelatin, and subsequent effect of the resulting microstructure on viability of seeded cells. Methods: Poly-epsilon-caprolactone and gelatin of varying blend concentrations were electrospun in horizontal and vertical setup orientations. NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were seeded on these scaffolds to assess cell viability changes in accordance with change in microstructure. Results: Blend electrospinning yielded a heterogeneous microstructure in the vertical orientation beyond a critical concentration of gelatin, and a homogeneous microstructure in the horizontal orientation. Unblended poly-epsilon-caprolactone electrospinning showed no significant difference in fibre diameter or pore size in either orientation. Mechanical testing showed reduced elasticity when poly-epsilon-caprolactone is blended with gelatin but an overall increase in tensile strength in the vertically spun samples. Cells on vertically spun samples showed significantly higher viabilities by day 7. Discussion: The composite microstructure obtained in vertically spun poly-epsilon-caprolactone -gelatin blends has a positive effect on viability of seeded cells. Such scaffolds can be considered suitable candidates for cardiovascular tissue engineering where cell infiltration is crucial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available