4.7 Article

A robust correlation analysis framework for imbalanced and dichotomous data with uncertainty

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 470, Issue -, Pages 58-77

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.08.017

Keywords

Pearson product-moment correlation; Imbalanced data; Clearness index; Dichotomous variable

Funding

  1. Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China under Grant from the Financial and Education Department of Guangdong Province [2016[202]]
  2. Education Department of Guangdong Province: New and Integrated Energy System Theory and Technology Research Group [2016KCXTD022]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Correlation analysis is one of the fundamental mathematical tools for identifying dependence between classes. However, the accuracy of the analysis could be jeopardized due to variance error in the data set. This paper provides a mathematical analysis of the impact of imbalanced data concerning Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC) analysis. To alleviate this issue, the novel framework Robust Correlation Analysis Framework (RCAF) is proposed to improve the correlation analysis accuracy. A review of the issues due to imbalanced data and data uncertainty in machine learning is given. The proposed framework is tested with in-depth analysis of real-life solar irradiance and weather condition data from Johannesburg, South Africa. Additionally, comparisons of correlation analysis with prominent sampling techniques, i.e., Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) and Adaptive Synthetic (ADASYN) sampling techniques are conducted. Finally, K-Means and Wards Agglomerative hierarchical clustering are performed to study the correlation results. Compared to the traditional PPMC, RCAF can reduce the standard deviation of the correlation coefficient under imbalanced data in the range of 32.5%-93.02%. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available