4.2 Article

Deregulated microRNAs and Adiponectin in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages 369-377

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000496340

Keywords

Breast cancer; Menopause; Obesity; MicroRNA; Adiponectin; Leptin; Insulin-like growth factors

Funding

  1. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social [FIS/IMSS/PROT/MD15/1495]
  2. National System of Investigators

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC). Some mechanisms through which obesity can lead to cancer development are insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), adipokines, and microRNAs (miRs). The objective of the study was to determine whether miR-17-5p, miR-195-5p, and miR-2213p expressions were deregulated in serum samples of obese and nonobese postmenopausal women with BC. In addition, insulin, adiponectin, leptin and IGFs were analyzed. Methods: Fifty postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed BC and 50 postmenopausal healthy women were evaluated. Differences in miRs between BC and healthy cases and between obese and lean participants were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves for miRs for discriminating patients with or without BC were established, and relationships between the miRs, adipokines, and breast tumor characteristics were also investigated. Results: miR-17-5p and miR-195-5p were higher in patients with BC in comparison to the controls, while miR-221-3p and adiponectin were significantly lower. Increased levels of miR-195-5p allowed the differentiation of BC from controls with a sensitivity of 83.3 and a specificity of 78.3%, and were associated with lobular and poorly differentiated cancer. There was no difference in miRs levels between obese and lean groups. Conclusions: Circulating miRs and adiponectin were deregulated in postmenopausal women with BC. (C) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available