4.4 Article

Early Archean planktonic mode of life: Implications from fluid dynamics of lenticular microfossils

Journal

GEOBIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 113-126

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gbi.12319

Keywords

Archean; flanged lenticular microfossils; fluid dynamics; planktonic; simulation

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX14AJ9OA, NNX16AT71G]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [KAKENHI JP15H02218, KAKENHI JP24654162]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lenticular, and commonly flanged, microfossils in 3.0-3.4 Ga sedimentary deposits in Western Australia and South Africa are unusually large (20-80 mu m across), robust, and widespread in space and time. To gain insight into the ecology of these organisms, we performed simulations of fluid dynamics of virtual cells mimicking lenticular forms of variable sizes, oblateness, flange presence, and flange thickness. Results demonstrate that (a) the flange reduces sedimentation velocity, (b) this flange function works more effectively in larger cells, and (c) modest oblateness lowers sedimentation rate. These observations support interpretations that the lenticular microbes were planktonic-a lifestyle that could have been advantageous in an early Earth harsh environment including violent volcanic activities, repeated asteroid impacts, and relatively high UV-radiation. Although the robustness of these organisms could have provided additional protection on the early Earth, this architecture may have impeded a planktonic lifestyle by increasing cell density. However, our data suggest that this disadvantage could have been compensated by enlargement of cell volume, which could have enhanced the ability of the flange to slow sedimentation rate, especially if coupled with vacuolation. The results of this simulation study may help to explain the unique morphology and unusually large size of these Archean microfossils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available