Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2019-01-12
DOI
10.1002/gepi.22184
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Instrumental Variables Estimation With Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomization
- (2016) Hyunseung Kang et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
- Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis
- (2016) Y. Iturria-Medina et al. Nature Communications
- Multivariable Mendelian Randomization: The Use of Pleiotropic Genetic Variants to Estimate Causal Effects
- (2015) S. Burgess et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression
- (2015) J. Bowden et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age
- (2015) Cathie Sudlow et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Robust Estimation for Secondary Trait Association in Case-Control Genetic Studies
- (2014) J. d. D. Tapsoba et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Lack of Identification in Semiparametric Instrumental Variable Models With Binary Outcomes
- (2014) Stephen Burgess et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization
- (2014) Neil M. Davies et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A general regression framework for a secondary outcome in case-control studies
- (2013) E. J. Tchetgen Tchetgen BIOSTATISTICS
- Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization
- (2013) Stephen Burgess et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Commentary: Building an evidence base for mendelian randomization studies: assessing the validity and strength of proposed genetic instrumental variables
- (2013) Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Instrumental Variable Estimators for Binary Outcomes
- (2012) Paul S. Clarke et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
- Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies
- (2011) Stephen Burgess et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Why Pleiotropic Interventions are Needed for Alzheimer's Disease
- (2010) Sally A. Frautschy et al. MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
- Mendelian randomization analysis of case-control data using structural mean models
- (2010) Jack Bowden et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects
- (2009) Leslie M. Shaw et al. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
- Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider
- (2009) Stephen R Cole et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Propagation of Tau Misfolding from the Outside to the Inside of a Cell
- (2009) Bess Frost et al. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
- Proper analysis of secondary phenotype data in case-control association studies
- (2008) D. Y. Lin et al. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses
- (2008) Tom M Palmer et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- ‘Mendelian randomization’ equals instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments
- (2008) George L. Wehby et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology
- (2007) Debbie A. Lawlor et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started