4.4 Article

Performance analysis of two-way full-duplex relay with antenna selection under Nakagami channels

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/s13638-018-1283-2

Keywords

Full-duplex relay; Amplify-and-forward relay; Antenna selection; Outage probability; Bit error rate

Funding

  1. National Thirteen Five National Defense Fund [6140311030207]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61801170, 61501405, U1504619, U1404615, 61271018, 61071113, 61671144]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633351]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Henan [162300410096, 182102110401]
  5. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in the University of Henan Province [17HASTIT025]
  6. Tibet National University Tibet cultural heritage development Collaborative Innovation Center 2018 tender twenty-first topic
  7. Tibet Natural Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on a full-duplex (FD) two-way relay network with one base station (BS), one FD amplify-and-forward (AF) relay, and one user, and the BS is equipped with massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antennas. To reduce the complexity and cost of BS, the paper proposes a practical antenna selection way in BS to complete transmission in two-way FD relay networks to optimize the system performance of outage probability or bit error ratio (BER). In the proposed scheme, BS can implement transmit antenna selection (AS) based on the instantaneous channel state information (CSI), thereby improving the system performance compared to the traditional FD relay networks. Furthermore, closed-form expressions for the outage probability and average BER are derived under Nakagami-m channels. The analytical results show that the superiority of proposed scheme compared with the conventional AF relay scheme and the correctness of the theoretical analysis verified by the Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available