4.7 Article

Multibiomarker biomonitoring approach using three bivalve species in the Ebro Delta (Catalonia, Spain)

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 36, Pages 36745-36758

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3614-6

Keywords

Mussel; Cockle; Razor shell; Biomarkers; Contaminants; Pesticides; Histology; Phycotoxins

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness project AIMCOST [CGL2016-76332-R MINECO/FEDER/UE]
  2. CERCA program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  3. project XENOMETABOLOMIC [CTM2015-73179-JIN AEI/FEDER/UE]
  4. project EMERGER [E-RTA2015-00004-00-00 INIA]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bivalves have proved to be useful bioindicators for environmental pollution. In the present study, mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis), cockles (Cerastoderma edule), and razor shells (Solen marginatus) were collected in the Ebro Delta, an extensive area devoted to rice farming and affected by pesticide pollution, from April to July, the heaviest rice field treatment period. Possible effects of pollution were assessed through biochemical markers (carboxylesterase (CE), antioxidant and neurotoxicity-related enzymes, and lipid peroxidation levels). Data on environmental variables, bivalve reproductive condition, and presence of organic pollutants, marine phycotoxins, pathogens, or histopathological conditions in bivalve's tissues were also evaluated. Although the bioaccumulated pesticides did not explain the patterns observed for biochemical responses, the obtained results point to an effect of environmental pesticide pollution on enzymatic markers, with a prominent contribution of CE to such changes. Mussels and razor shells provided a more sensitive biochemical response to pollution than cockles. Environmental variables, bivalve reproductive condition, and marine phycotoxins did not seem to have a relevant effect on the biomarkers assessed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available