4.7 Article

Climate effects of stringent air pollution controls mitigate future maize losses in China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaea09

Keywords

aerosol pollution; aerosol control policies; aerosol control technologies; NASA ModelE2-YIBs; APSIM; maize

Funding

  1. China's National Key Research Special Program-the 5th project [2016YFC0207705]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41661144006, 31661143012]
  3. Newton Fund [AHKF-7DZH3G]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future anthropogenic aerosol and greenhouse gas emissions determine climate change in China, which influences crop growth and food production. However, very few studies have investigated their combined climate impacts on crop yields. Here, we apply a process-based modeling approach to examine potential climatic impacts of air pollution controls on maize yields in China for two future scenarios in the 2030s. The model suggests that reducing aerosol pollution emissions increases radiation, temperature and precipitation. Increased radiation and precipitation enhance yields while higher temperature reduces yields. These contrasting climate effects offset each other, leading to varied spatial responses in yields. Following the current legislation emission scenario, maize yield declines by 2.3% because air pollution shows only moderate reductions and the higher future temperature exerts the dominant detrimental impacts. In contrast, with the maximum technically feasible reduction scenario, the maize yield is projected to increase by 4.4% relative to the current level, because the benefit of increased radiation and precipitation outweighs the detrimental impacts of warming. Our results suggest that stringent aerosol pollution regulations can help mitigate maize yield losses in China due to the future climate warming.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available