4.6 Article

Unexpectedly high energy density of a Li-Ion battery by oxygen redox in LiNiO2 cathode: First-principles study

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 294, Issue -, Pages 166-172

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.113

Keywords

First-principles calculation; Li-ion battery; Density of states; Cluster expansion; Monte Carlo simulation

Funding

  1. Global Frontier Program through the Global Frontier Hybrid Interface Materials (GFHIM) of National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2013M3A6B1078882]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventionally neglected mechanism of reversible redox reactions by oxygen ions in lithium-nickel oxide materials (LNO; Li2xNi2-2xO2, 0 < x < 1) is proposed as a primary cause of unexpectedly high energy density of Li- ion battery. Using first-principles density functional theory calculations, cluster expansion theory, and Monte Carlo simulations, we unveil the underlying mechanism that is ascribed to the phase transition between layered and rocksalt structures initiated by cation disordering of Li and Ni at certain Li composition. At x = 0.5, the oxygen ions are put under specific chemical bondings of straight-linear type Li-O-Li configuration. They enable an active oxygen redox reaction involving peroxo (O-2(2-)) and superoxo (O-2(-)) ions, shown to dramatically increase the energy density of the LNO cathode. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we identify the proportional information to find the Li-O-Li configurations around the synthetic temperature of LNO materials. Our results indicate that the cation-disorder is a driving force for the oxygen redox via formation of the specific bondings. On the basis of our study, it is expected to provide useful guidelines for the design of Li- ion batteries with high energy densities beyond conventional ones. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available