4.5 Article

BAFF-R and TACI expression on CD3+T cells: Interplay among BAFF, APRIL and T helper cytokines profile in systemic lupus erythematosus

Journal

CYTOKINE
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 115-127

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2018.11.008

Keywords

APRIL; BAFF; BAFF receptors; Disease activity; Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokine profile; Systemic lupus erythematosus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the prototype of systemic autoimmune disease, characterized by loss of immune tolerance against self-antigens where autoantibody production is the hallmark of disease. B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) and A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) are cytokines that promote auto reactive cell survival, immunoglobulin-class switching and autoantibody responses in human and mouse SLE models. BAFF and APRIL exert their functions through interactions with their receptors BAFF-R and TACI that are differentially expressed in B lymphocyte subsets, monocytes, dendritic cells and T lymphocytes. BAFF stimulation favors T lymphocyte activation and cytokine production through BAFF-R, which could contribute to the Th1, Th17 and/or Th2 response dysregulation observed in SLE patients. Objective: To evaluate the expression of the cytokines BAFF and APRIL and their association with the receptors BAFF-R and TACI on CD3 + T cells and to evaluate Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokine profile in patients with SLE. Methods: Fifteen healthy controls (HC) and 36 SLE patients were included, and their demographic and clinical data were assessed. The disease activity index (Mex-SLEDAI) and damage index (SLICC) were applied to the SLE patients. BAFF-R and TACT expression on CD3 + T cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Serum BAFF and APRIL concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Cytokine levels of Thl (IL-12, IL-2, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha), Th2 (IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13) and Th17 (IL-1 beta e IL-17) were quantified with a multiplex assay (MAGPIX). Statistical analysis was performed using PASW Statistics v.20 and GraphPad Prism v.6 software. Results: No differences in BAFF-R or TACI expression on the CD3 + T cells of SLE and HC were observed. BAFF-R expression correlates inversely with disease activity (r = -0.538, p < 0.01), while TACI correlates with disease activity (r = 0.530, p < 0.05). Serum BAFF and APRIL levels were high in SLE patients and correlated with the disease activity index Mex-SLEDAI (r = 0.621, p < 0.01 and r = 0.416, p < 0.05). SLE patients were found to have significantly higher levels of IL-12, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-10, IL-1 beta, IL-1 beta and IL-17 compared to HC (p < 0.05). Cytokines IL-17 (r = 0.526) and TNF-alpha (r = 0.410) correlate with disease activity (p < 0.05), while APRIL (r = 0.477), IL-10 (r = 0.426) and IFN-gamma (r = 0.440) levels were associated with organ damage (p < 0.01). Serum BAFF expression levels correlate with 1L-4 (r = 0.424; p < 0.05), IL-6 (r = 0.420; p < 0.05) and IL-10 (r = 0.459; p < 0.01), whereas APRIL levels correlate with IL-2 (r = 0.666; p < 0.01), IL-12 (r = 0.611; p < 0.01) and TNF-alpha (r = 0.471; p < 0.05) cytokines. A subgroup of SLE patients with high serum BAFF levels ( > 2 ng/mL) also showed increased APRIL, IL-2, IL-6 and IL-10 levels (p < 0.05). Finally, BAFF, IL-4 and TNF-alpha serum levels were associated with high titers of antinuclear antibodies. Conclusions: The study demonstrates an imbalance in the Th1/Th2 cytokine profile, with increased proinflammatory cytokines, as well as BAFF and APRIL serum levels. Associations of BAFF with Th2 profile cytokines and disease activity, as well as APRIL with Thl profile cytokines and organ damage, suggest that BAFF and APRIL generated in the autoimmunity context could through still unknown mechanisms, modulate the micro environment, and perpetuate the inflammatory response, autoantibody production and organ damage observed in SLE patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available