4.4 Review

Stem cell therapies for Alzheimer's disease: is it time?

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 105-116

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000478

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; neurogenesis; stem cell transplantation; treatment

Categories

Funding

  1. Institute of Clinical Medicine Research in the Yeouido St. Mary's hospital, Catholic University of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Stem cell therapy has the potential to modify the disease of Alzheimer's disease. This article aims to describe the mechanisms of action, preclinical animal studies, human clinical trials, and challenges for the future direction of stem cell therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Recent findings Stem cells of diverse origins (embryonic, placental or umbilical cord blood, and induced pluripotent stem cells) and cell types (neural and mesenchymal stem cells) are widely studied in both animals and humans. Summary In terms of mechanism of actions, recent research focused on the interplay between amyloid-beta Ab (and tau), neurons, and glia. Stem cells can induce direct regeneration of neurons and synapses. They can also prevent activation of pro-inflammatory microglia, promote activation of anti-inflammatory microglia, inhibit astrogliosis, and promote nonreactive astrocytes. These effects in return may increase amyloid-beta (Ab) degradation, decrease the risk of the Ab cascade, repair injured neurons, and enhance synaptogenesis. Two completed and nine ongoing clinical trials using diverse stem cells and administration methods (intravenous, subcutaneous, and intra-cranial) were found for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Although stem cell therapy shows great potential to become a prospective treatment for Alzheimer's disease in the future, these studies are still in their early stages and more studies showing safety and efficacy are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available