4.7 Review

Rare-earth metal based adsorbents for effective removal of arsenic from water: A critical review

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 22-24, Pages 1127-1164

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2018.1514930

Keywords

Adsorption; applications; arsenic; ligand exchange; rare-earth metal; surface complexation

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arsenic contamination is a global environmental problem due to arsenic's high toxicity, bioaccumulation in human body and food chain, and severe carcinogenicity to humans. Development of cost-effective remediation technologies is of importance due to the implementation of stricter regulation for drinking water. This review article focuses on the chemical properties and applications of three rare-earth metals (REMs, lanthanum, cerium, and yttrium) based adsorbents for arsenic removal. Among them, cerium (IV) based adsorbents are more efficient for simultaneous adsorption and oxidization of As(III) from the aqueous solutions, while the yttrium based adsorbents adsorb more arsenic than other REM based adsorbents. A series of studies has demonstrated that higher removal efficiency of arsenic can be obtained by the adsorbents that are fabricated by combination of the REMs with less costly and commonly existing metals such as iron and manganese. Faster adsorption can be achieved by using the REM doped support materials that have larger specific surface areas and greater porosity. Ligand exchange, and surface complexation play key roles in the adsorption. It is concluded that the REM based adsorbents can greatly outperform the conventional metal based adsorbents for the industrial applications of treatment of arsenic containing wastewater.A

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available