4.5 Article

An investigation of linguistic stress and articulatory vowel characteristics for automatic depression classification

Journal

COMPUTER SPEECH AND LANGUAGE
Volume 53, Issue -, Pages 140-155

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2018.08.001

Keywords

Hypoarticulation; Paralinguistics; Psychomotor retardation; Vowel quadrilateral

Funding

  1. ARC Discovery Project [DP130101094]
  2. ARC Linkage Project [LP160101360]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of psychomotor retardation associated with clinical depression are linked to a reduction in variability in acoustic parameters. However, linguistic stress differences between non-depressed and clinically depressed individuals have yet to be investigated. In this paper, by examining vowel articulatory parameters, statistically significant differences in articulatory characteristics are found at a paraphonetic level. For articulatory characteristic features, tongue height and advancement in terms of 'mid' and 'front' vowel sets show similar depression classification performance trends for both the DAIC-WOZ (English) and AViD (German) databases. Considering linguistic stress feature components, for both databases, depressed speakers exhibit shorter vowel durations and less variance for 'low', 'back', and 'rounded' vowel positions. Results for the DAIC-WOZ and AViD datasets using a small set of linguistic stress based features derived from multiple vowel articulatory parameter sets show absolute, statistically significant, gains of 7% and 20% in two-class depression classification performance over baseline approaches. Linguistic stress feature results indicate that specific vowel set analysis provides better discrimination of clinically depressed and non-depressed speakers. Knowledge gleaned from this research allows the design of more effective automatic depression disorder classification systems. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available