4.7 Article

AF9 promotes hESC neural differentiation through recruiting TET2 to neurodevelopmental gene loci for methylcytosine hydroxylation

Journal

CELL DISCOVERY
Volume 1, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/celldisc.2015.17

Keywords

AF9; TET2; human embryonic stem cell; neural differentiation; 5-hydroxymethylcytosine

Categories

Funding

  1. 'Strategic Priority Research Program' of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA01010201]
  2. National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China [2014CB964804, 2015CB964500]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91219303, 31430058, 31401261]
  4. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M541560]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AF9 mutations have been implicated in human neurodevelopmental diseases and murine Af9 mediates histone methylation during cortical neuron generation. However, AF9 function and related mechanisms in human neurodevelopment remain unknown. Here we show that AF9 is necessary and sufficient for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) neural differentiation and neurodevelopmental gene activation. The 5-methylcytosine (5mC) dioxygenase TET2, which was identified in an AF9-associated protein complex, physically interacted with AF9. Both AF9 and TET2 co-localized in 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC)-positive hESC-derived neurons and were required for appropriate hESC neural differentiation. Upon binding to AAC-containing motifs, AF9 recruited TET2 to occupy the common neurodevelopmental gene loci to direct 5mC-to-5hmC conversion, which was followed by sequential activation of neural target genes and hESC neural commitment. These findings define an AF9-TET2 regulatory complex for modulating human neural development and reveal a novel mechanism by which the AF9 recognition specificity and TET2 hydroxylation activity cooperate to control neurodevelopmental gene activation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available