4.6 Article

Facile Synthesis of Ultrastable Porous Aromatic Frameworks by Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling Reaction for Adsorption Removal of Organic Dyes

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 15, Pages 3903-3908

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201805713

Keywords

adsorption; cross-coupling; dyes; pigments; mesoporous and microporous materials; porous aromatic frameworks

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZJNSF) [LY19B020003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21302061, 21531003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs) with robust structure, high stability, and high surface area have attracted intense interest from scientists in diverse fields. However, there are still very few reports on the adsorption of organic dyes by PAFs. In this work, four new PAFs have been facilely synthesized by the polymerization of a tetrahedral-shaped (four-node) monomer with a series of three-node monomers through Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions. All the obtained materials possess hierarchical porous structures and show high thermal and chemical stability. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas of these PAFs were determined to be 857m(2)g(-1) for PAF-111, 526m(2)g(-1) for PAF-112A, 725m(2)g(-1) for PAF-112B, and 598m(2)g(-1) for PAF-113. RhodamineB was selected as a model organic dye to test the adsorption capacities of the obtained PAF materials. PAF-111 showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 1666mgg(-1) (167wt%) for RhodamineB, which is among the highest values reported to date for porous organic materials. It is noteworthy that PAF-111 could be reused in at least ten cycles under the adsorption conditions without any loss of adsorption capacity. Our study has revealed the great potential and advantages of PAFs as ultrastable adsorption materials for the removal of organic dyes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available