4.3 Article

Separation of heterocyclic nitrogen compounds from coal tar fractions via ionic liquids: COSMO-SAC screening and experimental study

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 206, Issue 9, Pages 1199-1217

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2018.1552855

Keywords

Coal tar; COSMO-SAC; Extraction; Ionic liquids; Nitrogen compounds; Screening

Funding

  1. Shandong Provincial Key Research & Development Project [2018GGX107001]
  2. Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J18KA072]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878178]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology for Recruited Talents
  5. Shenzhen Supercomputer Center (DMol3)
  6. Shenzhen Supercomputer Center (Reflex modules of Materials Studio)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ionic liquids (ILs) have been applied as a promising solvent for the separation of different kinds of compounds. But the enormous combination possibilities of the cations and anions make it a challenging task to screen an appropriate IL for a specific application. Thus, the method for screening IL candidates based on the COSMO-SAC model is presented and illustrated to extract heterocyclic nitrogen compounds, indole and carbazole, from coal tar fractions. Also, the sigma-profile analysis is used to evaluate the effect of different types of cations and anions, and systematically confirmed the structure-activity relationships for the extraction process. Then, 22 cations and 19 anions are screened as the initial structures of the potential extractants from a sigma-profile database (containing 39 cations and 29 anions). Along with the rigorous evaluation criterion proposed in this work, three IL extractants are adopted. Afterwards, the extractive ability of the candidates is experimentally investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available