Concordance of cancer registry and self-reported race, ethnicity, and cancer type: a report from the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Concordance of cancer registry and self-reported race, ethnicity, and cancer type: a report from the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature America, Inc
Online
2018-11-03
DOI
10.1007/s10552-018-1091-3
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Some thoughts on health surveillance data, race, and population categorization
- (2016) Otis W. Brawley CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- Cancer statistics for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders, 2016: Converging incidence in males and females
- (2016) Lindsey A. Torre et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- Cancer statistics, 2016
- (2016) Rebecca L. Siegel et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2012, featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer
- (2016) A. Blythe Ryerson et al. CANCER
- Self-Reported Physical Activity Levels of Older Cancer Survivors: Results from the 2014 National Health Interview Survey
- (2016) Yelena Tarasenko et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
- Risk Factors, Preventive Practices, and Health Care Among Breast Cancer Survivors, United States, 2010
- (2016) Sherri G. Homan et al. Preventing Chronic Disease
- Associations between human papillomavirus and history of cancer among U.S. adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2003–2010)
- (2014) B Liu et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Accuracy of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Preference in an Electronic Health Record
- (2014) Elissa V. Klinger et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Chronic disease burden among cancer survivors in the California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2009–2010
- (2014) Heather P. Tarleton et al. Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Cancer Survivors in the United States: Prevalence across the Survivorship Trajectory and Implications for Care
- (2013) J. S. de Moor et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Network for Cancer Control Research in American Indians and Alaska Natives: a Historical Perspective
- (2012) James W. Hampton JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION
- A systematic review of large-scale surveys of cancer survivors conducted in North America, 2000–2011
- (2012) Catherine C. Lerro et al. Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Concordance of self-reported and medical chart information on cancer diagnosis and treatment
- (2011) Vinay Gupta et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The validity of self-reported cancer diagnoses and factors associated with accurate reporting in a cohort of older Australian women
- (2011) Efty Stavrou et al. Cancer Epidemiology
- Confirmation of Family Cancer History Reported in a Population-Based Survey
- (2011) Phuong L. Mai et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Methods for improving cancer surveillance data in American Indian and Alaska Native populations
- (2010) David K. Espey et al. CANCER
- The “Meaningful Use” Regulation for Electronic Health Records
- (2010) David Blumenthal et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Method agreement analysis: A review of correct methodology
- (2010) P.F. Watson et al. THERIOGENOLOGY
- Tribal Linkage and Race Data Quality for American Indians in a State Cancer Registry
- (2009) Jennifer C. Johnson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Accuracy of self-reported breast cancer among women undergoing mammography
- (2009) Linn Abraham et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- Future of Cancer Incidence in the United States: Burdens Upon an Aging, Changing Nation
- (2009) Benjamin D. Smith et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started