4.4 Article

Influence of daily 10-85 μg vitamin D supplements during pregnancy and lactation on maternal vitamin D status and mature milk antirachitic activity

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages 426-438

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114518003598

Keywords

Adequate intake; Antirachitic activity; Breast milk; Pregnancy; Supplements; Vitamin D

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economic Affairs
  2. Province of Groningen
  3. Province of Drenthe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pregnant and lactating women and breastfed infants are at risk of vitamin D deficiency. The supplemental vitamin D dose that optimises maternal vitamin D status and breast milk antirachitic activity (ARA) is unclear. Healthy pregnant women were randomised to 10 (n 10), 35 (n 11), 60 (n 11) and 85 (n 11) mu g vitamin D-3/d from 20 gestational weeks (GW) to 4 weeks postpartum (PP). The participants also received increasing dosages of fish oil supplements and a multivitamin. Treatment allocation was not blinded. Parent vitamin D and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) were measured in maternal plasma at 20 GW, 36 GW and 4 weeks PP, and in milk at 4 weeks PP. Median 25(OH)D and parent vitamin D at 20 GW were 85 (range 25-131) nmol/l and 'not detectable (nd)' (range nd-40) nmol/l. Both increased, seemingly dose dependent, from 20 to 36 GW and decreased from 36 GW to 4 weeks PP. In all, 35 mu g vitamin D/d was needed to increase 25(OH)D to adequacy (80-249 nmol/l) in >97 center dot 5 % of participants at 36 GW, while >85 mu g/d was needed to reach this criterion at 4 weeks PP. The 25(OH)D increments from 20 to 36 GW and from 20 GW to 4 weeks PP diminished with supplemental dose and related inversely to 25(OH)D at 20 GW. Milk ARA related to vitamin D-3 dose, but the infant adequate intake of 513 IU/l was not reached. Vitamin D-3 dosages of 35 and >85 mu g/d were needed to reach adequate maternal vitamin D status at 36 GW and 4 weeks PP, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available