“Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
“Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
Authors
Keywords
MCID, Functional tests, Chronic musculoskeletal pain
Journal
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2019-01-05
DOI
10.1186/s12891-018-2382-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Global rating of change: perspectives of patients with lumbar impairments and of their physical therapists
- (2018) Ying-Chih Wang et al. PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE
- Application of minimal important differences in degenerative knee disease outcomes: a systematic review and case study to inform BMJ Rapid Recommendations
- (2017) Tahira Devji et al. BMJ Open
- Chronic musculoskeletal pain in Japan (the final report of the 3-year longitudinal study): Association with a future decline in activities of daily living
- (2017) Keiko Sugai et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
- Defining major trauma using the 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale
- (2016) Cameron S Palmer et al. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED
- Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review
- (2016) Richard W. Bohannon et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review
- (2016) Dennis R. Louie et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
- Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions
- (2015) Nathaniel P Katz et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Grip Strength?
- (2014) Jae Kwang Kim et al. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
- The 6-minute walk test and other clinical endpoints in duchenne muscular dystrophy: Reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal clinically important differences from a multicenter study
- (2013) Craig M. McDonald et al. MUSCLE & NERVE
- Validation of a consensus-based minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold using an objective functional external anchor
- (2013) Robert J. Gatchel et al. Spine Journal
- The five-repetition sit-to-stand test as a functional outcome measure in COPD
- (2013) Sarah E Jones et al. THORAX
- Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Six-Minute Walk Test and the 200-Meter Fast-Walk Test During Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in Coronary Artery Disease Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome
- (2011) Vincent Gremeaux et al. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
- Performance Tests in People With Chronic Low Back Pain
- (2010) Eleonor I. Andersson et al. SPINE
- The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference
- (2009) Dan Turner et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences of Upper-Extremity Measures Early After Stroke
- (2008) Catherine E. Lang et al. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
- Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
- (2007) Dennis Revicki et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started