How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC Medicine
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature America, Inc
Online
2018-11-27
DOI
10.1186/s12916-018-1211-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Is digital medicine different?
- (2018) The Lancet LANCET
- How standards and user involvement can improve app quality: A lifecycle approach
- (2018) Michelle Helena van Velthoven et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
- Accuracy of smartphone apps for heart rate measurement
- (2017) Thomas Coppetti et al. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
- Use of and Beliefs About Mobile Phone Apps for Diabetes Self-Management: Surveys of People in a Hospital Diabetes Clinic and Diabetes Health Professionals in New Zealand
- (2017) Leah Boyle et al. JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- Evaluating Digital Health Interventions
- (2016) Elizabeth Murray et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Challenges in Assessing Mobile Health App Quality
- (2016) Quinn H. Grundy et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Beyond the Randomized Controlled Trial: A Review of Alternatives in mHealth Clinical Trial Methods
- (2016) Quynh Pham et al. JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment
- (2015) Kit Huckvale et al. BMC Medicine
- ‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps
- (2015) Paul Wicks et al. BMC Medicine
- The evolution of mobile apps for asthma: an updated systematic assessment of content and tools
- (2015) Kit Huckvale et al. BMC Medicine
- What makes a good clinical app? Introducing the RCP Health Informatics Unit checklist
- (2015) J. C. Wyatt et al. CLINICAL MEDICINE
- The need for quality assurance of health apps
- (2015) Brian McMillan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The need for quality assurance of health apps
- (2015) Brian McMillan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps
- (2015) Stoyan R Stoyanov et al. JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- Automation bias: Empirical results assessing influencing factors
- (2014) Kate Goddard et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
- mHealth and Mobile Medical Apps: A Framework to Assess Risk and Promote Safer Use
- (2014) Thomas Lorchan Lewis et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- A Content Analysis of Popular Smartphone Apps for Smoking Cessation
- (2013) Lorien C. Abroms et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- A Comparison of the Reliability of Smartphone Apps for Opioid Conversion
- (2013) Faye Haffey et al. DRUG SAFETY
- Diagnostic Inaccuracy of Smartphone Applications for Melanoma Detection
- (2013) Joel A. Wolf et al. JAMA Dermatology
- “Let’s get Wasted!” and Other Apps: Characteristics, Acceptability, and Use of Alcohol-Related Smartphone Applications
- (2013) Emma R Weaver et al. JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- The case for randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of clinical information systems
- (2011) J. L. Y. Liu et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
- Making electronic prescribing alerts more effective: scenario-based experimental study in junior doctors
- (2011) Gregory P T Scott et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
- Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators
- (2011) Kate Goddard et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started