4.7 Article

Dosage sensitivity of X-linked genes in human embryonic single cells

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5432-8

Keywords

Dosage compensation; Sex chromosome; Evolution

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0103504]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671320, 81830103, 31871320, 31771406]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundDuring the evolution of mammalian sex chromosomes, the degeneration of Y-linked homologs has led to a dosage imbalance between X-linked and autosomal genes. The evolutionary resolution to such dosage imbalance, as hypothesized by Susumu Ohno fifty years ago, should be doubling the expression of X-linked genes. Recent studies have nevertheless shown that the X to autosome expression ratio equals similar to 1 in haploid human parthenogenetic embryonic stem (pES) cells and similar to 0.5 in diploid pES cells, suggesting no doubled expression for X-linked genes and refuting Ohno's hypothesis.ResultsHere, by reanalyzing an RNA-seq-based single-cell transcriptome dataset of human embryos, we found that from the 8-cell stage until the time-point just prior to implantation, the expression levels of X-linked genes are not two-fold upregulated in male cells and gradually decrease from two-fold in female cells. Additional analyses of gene expression noise further suggest that the dosage sensitivity of X-linked genes is weaker than that of autosomal genes in differentiated female cells, which contradicts a key assumption in Ohno's hypothesis, that most X-linked genes are dosage sensitive. Moreover, the dosage-sensitive housekeeping genes are preferentially located on autosomes, implying selection against X-linkage for dosage-sensitive genes.ConclusionsWe observed dosage imbalance between X-linked and autosomal genes, as well as relatively high expression noise from X-linked genes. These results collectively suggest that X-linked genes are less dosage sensitive than autosomal genes, putting one primary assumption of Ohno's hypothesis in question.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available