4.6 Article

Extension of the yeast metabolic model to include iron metabolism and its use to estimate global levels of iron-recruiting enzyme abundance from cofactor requirements

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages 610-621

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.26905

Keywords

enzyme cofactor turnover; iron metabolism; iron-sulphur maturation; metabolic networks; yeast

Funding

  1. Leverhulme Trust [ECF-2016-681]
  2. FP7 Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology [289126]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BRIC2.2]
  4. BBSRC [BB/K011138/1, BB/L004437/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolic networks adapt to changes in their environment by modulating the activity of their enzymes and transporters; often by changing their abundance. Understanding such quantitative changes can shed light onto how metabolic adaptation works, or how it can fail and lead to a metabolically dysfunctional state. We propose a strategy to quantify metabolic protein requirements for cofactor-utilising enzymes and transporters through constraint-based modelling. The first eukaryotic genome-scale metabolic model to comprehensively represent iron metabolism was constructed, extending the most recent community model of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Partial functional impairment of the genes involved in the maturation of iron-sulphur (Fe-S) proteins was investigated employing the model and the in silico analysis revealed extensive rewiring of the fluxes in response to this functional impairment, despite its marginal phenotypic effect. The optimal turnover rate of enzymes bearing ion cofactors can be determined via this novel approach; yeast metabolism, at steady state, was determined to employ a constant turnover of its iron-recruiting enzyme at a rate of 3.02 x 10(-11) mmol center dot(g biomass)(-1)center dot h (-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available