4.2 Article

Donor Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Genotype Does Not Improve Graft-versus-Leukemia Responses in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia after Unrelated Donor Transplant: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis

Journal

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 949-954

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.763

Keywords

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; KIR; Allogeneic transplantation; Genotype; NK cells

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL1TR000114]
  3. NCI [P01 111412, 1U24HL138660]
  4. NIH [P30 CA77598]
  5. Public Health Service from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) [5U24CA076518]
  6. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [5U24CA076518]
  7. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [5U24CA076518]
  8. NHLBI [1U24HL138660]
  9. Health Resources and Services Administration [HHSH250201700006C]
  10. Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-1-2388, N00014-17-1-2850, N00014-18-1-2045]
  11. Adaptive Biotechnologies
  12. Amgen, Inc.
  13. Astellas Pharma US
  14. Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc.
  15. Be the Match Foundation
  16. bluebird bio, Inc.
  17. Bristol Myers Squibb Oncology
  18. Celgene Corporation
  19. Chimerix, Inc.
  20. CytoSen Therapeutics, Inc.
  21. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  22. Gamida Cell Ltd.
  23. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  24. HistoGenetics, Inc.
  25. Immucor
  26. Incyte Corporation
  27. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
  28. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  29. Karius, Inc.
  30. Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc.
  31. Kite Pharma, Inc.
  32. Medac
  33. GmbH
  34. Mediware
  35. Medical College of Wisconsin
  36. Merck Co, Inc.
  37. Mesoblast
  38. MesoScale Diagnostics, Inc.
  39. Millennium
  40. Takeda Oncology Co.
  41. Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.
  42. Mundipharma EDO
  43. National Marrow Donor Program
  44. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  45. PCORI
  46. Pfizer, Inc
  47. Pharmacyclics, LLC
  48. PIRCHE AG
  49. Sanofi Genzyme
  50. Seattle Genetics
  51. Shire
  52. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  53. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  54. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Inc.
  55. Takeda Oncology
  56. University of Minnesota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) remains the sole curative therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), leading to 40% to 45% long-term survival. The impact of donor killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genotype on outcomes of unrelated donor (URD) alloHCT for CLL is unknown. We examined 573 adult URD CLL recipient pairs. KIR genotype (presence/absence) was determined for each donor, and comprehensive modeling of interactions with recipient HLA class I loci (KIR ligands) was used to evaluate their effect on relapse and survival. Recipients had a median age of 56 years, and most were not in remission (65%). Both 8/8 HLA-matched (81%) or 7/8 HLA matched grafts (19%) were studied. Factors associated with improved overall survival (OS) were reduced-intensity conditioning (hazard ratio [HR] of death, .76) and good performance status (HR, .46), whereas alloHCT in nonremission (HR, 1.96) and mismatched donors (HR, 2.01) increased mortality. No models demonstrated a relationship between donor KIR genotype and transplant outcomes. Cox regression models comparing donors with A/A versus B/x KIR haplotypes and those with KIR gene content scores of 0 versus 1 versus >= 2 yielded similar rates of nonrelapse mortality, relapse, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and chronic GVHD and the same progression-free survival and OS. Relapse risk was not different for grafts from donors with KIR3DL1 transplanted into HLA C1/1 versus C2 recipients. This large analysis failed to demonstrate an association between URD KIR genotype and transplant outcome for patients with CLL, and thus KIR genotyping should not be used as a donor selection criterion in this setting. (C) 2019 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available