4.6 Article

5-year oncological outcomes of targeted axillary sampling in pT1-2N1 breast cancer

Journal

ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 681-687

Publisher

ELSEVIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.10.004

Keywords

Breast; Carcinoma; Lymph node; Dissection; Sampling

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korea government [2014R1A5A2009242, 2017R1C1B5076186]
  2. National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [1420040]
  3. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI17C1142]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1C1B5076186] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) has been a standard treatment in breast cancer with positive sentinel LNs. However, various short- and long-term postoperative morbidities have been reported after conventional ALND. To define the concept of targeted axillary sampling (AS) and to assess its oncological feasibility for breast cancer. We compared the oncological outcomes in the axillary area between conventional ALND and targeted AS with or without radiotherapy. Methods: One hundred and twenty-nine female patients with cT1-2N1 breast cancer underwent breast and axillary surgery. We defined the concept of targeted AS in clinical and pathological terms, and the oncological outcomes were compared between ALND and AS, and between AS with and without radiotherapy. Results: There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes in the axilla between conventional ALND and AS, or between AS with radiotherapy and AS alone. Conclusions: The 5-year oncological outcomes of targeted AS were not inferior to those of conventional ALND, regardless of whether radiotherapy was added. (C) 2018 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available