4.3 Article

Nondestructive adult age at death estimation: Visualizing cementum annulations in a known age historical human assemblage using synchrotron X-ray microtomography

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Volume 168, Issue 1, Pages 25-44

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23702

Keywords

adult age at death; cementochronology; propagation phase contrast; virtual histology

Funding

  1. European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
  2. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Adult age at death estimation continues to challenge physical anthropologists. One estimation method involves counting tooth cementum annulations (TCA). Non-destructively accessing TCA is a critical step to approaching fossil teeth of unknown age and to verifying life history profiles of human ancestors. This pilot study aims to (a) non-destructively image TCA in teeth from a known age archeological human population by propagation phase contrast X-ray synchrotron mu CT (PPC-SR-mu CT) (b) test the correlation between real and estimated ages, and the accuracy, precision and bias of age estimates. Materials and Methods We examine 20 permanent human canines (aged 20-81 years), from a 18th to 19th century known age collection from St. Luke's Church (London, England). We scanned transverse segments of acellular cementum in the apical portion of the middle root third using PPC-SR-mu CT. We generated virtual transverse sections on which two observers perform two sessions of blind TCA counts. We calculate the estimated ages at death by adding 10 years to the TCA counts. Results A moderately strong positive linear relationship exists between real and estimated ages (r = 0.76, p < .001), with an average inaccuracy of 16.1 years and an average bias towards underestimation of 15.7 years. This difference is lower in individuals <50 years (6.8 and 6.5 years, respectively, n = 10) compared with those >50 years (24.9 years, n = 10). Discussion We reliably imaged and identified TCA in individuals

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available